Monday, December 3, 2012
I have a google site.
Here is the link to my google site.
https://sites.google.com/site/klinezr/
It is a great resource for web 2.0 tools, learning about the flipped classroom, and project based learning.
Action Research Report
I completed my action research on communication. Below is the report.
Communication between staff and parents is kind of like kids learning styles. Some parents, like me (my son is in elementary), prefer email or notes to communicate while others like face to face. Each set of parents is different. I would send a survey out at the beginning of the year to see how each parent would prefer to be communicated with! I cannot stand to talk on the phone so would really not like to be receiving phone calls from teachers.
Abstract
Belton Middle School is located in Belton, TX. Belton ISD opened a third middle school for
the 2011-12 school year. Before the
school could open, attendance boundaries were redrawn. Belton Middle School was a Title I school
during the 2010-11 school year. However,
after the attendance boundaries were approved, Belton Middle School was no
longer a Title I school. With new
student demographics, the campus wanted to know how to effectively communicate
with the new stakeholders. A survey was
created and 12 parents formed a panel to promote discussion on several topics
during in-service. The cumulating
results indicated that parents want weekly general information and specific
detailed information regarding their student when needed. Parents strongly performed email
communication but stressed the importance of traditional communication for
specific topics such as discipline.
Title and Author
Increasing Parental Communication in Secondary Schools Through
Electronic Media by Zachary Kline
Introduction
/ Background (Section One)
Belton ISD opened a third middle school for the 2011-12 school year. New attendance boundaries were created. The criteria for the new boundaries were to
have neighborhood schools, balance campus sizes, maintain transportation routes,
and meet the needs of future projected growth of the community. Boundary
changes impacted the student demographics at Belton Middle School.
During the 2010-11 school year, Belton Middle School was a Title I school.
56.8% of the student population was from
low-income families. After the attendance
boundary change, Belton Middle School had a 21.6% decrease in low-income
students. Table 1 illustrates the
demographic changes from the 2010 -11 school year to 2011-12.
Table 1
Belton Middle School AEIS Student Demographics
|
|
2010-11
|
2011-12
|
Difference
|
|
African American
|
7.4
|
4.3
|
-3.1
|
|
Hispanic
|
35.4
|
29.7
|
-5.7
|
|
White
|
53.3
|
62.3
|
9.0
|
|
American Indian
|
1.0
|
1.1
|
0.1
|
|
Asian
|
0.9
|
2.6
|
1.7
|
|
Pacific Islander
|
0.4
|
0
|
-0.4
|
|
Two or more races
|
1.6
|
1.9
|
.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eco Disadvantaged
|
56.8
|
35.2
|
-21.6
|
|
LEP
|
6.1
|
4.1
|
-2
|
|
At Risk
|
37.5
|
33.6
|
-3.9
|
|
Mobility
|
14.2
|
15.3
|
1.1
|
The
need for a communication assessment stems from the change of demographics at
Belton Middle School. The research seeks
to identify the most effective form of parent communication and parent
communication preferences. As different
generations and families of various income levels seek to communicate with each
other, the research is aimed at providing effective communication from school
to home.
Parents express two
contrasting views in regards of school to home communication. Some believe there is very little
communication and feel less informed than the campus their student previously
attended. Other parents indicate that
they are very pleased with the communication from Belton Middle School. Communication between staff and parents is similar
to student learning styles. Some parents prefer email or notes to communicate
while others like face to face. Each parent is different.
The 2010-11 staff at Belton Middle School knew that the demographics
of the student population was going to change.
The question that was at hand was how effective is the current methods
of communication and how can we better communicate.
Administrators and staff communicate with parents daily. It is imperative that staff engages in
effective communication. Those who will
benefit from this research is diverse. Primarily,
administrators and teachers at Belton Middle School will benefit. Effective communication promotes a positive
campus culture that leads to school-parent partnerships that enable school
programs to reach new heights. Finally,
other administrators in the district and around the world will be benefit from
the added knowledge base of school communication.
Terms:
Title I - The purpose of this title is to ensure that all children have
a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education. To be eligible, the campus demographics must
be over 50% economically disadvantaged.
Literature
Review (Section Two)
Schools communicate in two ways. They send general information to everyone or
specific information to specified individuals.
Epstein (1987) developed a framework for understanding the school-family
partnership, called overlapping spheres.
Two levels of interaction between schools and families: institutional
and individual. Institutional
interactions refer to general practices that involve all families including
parent-teacher organizations, open house, newsletters, calendars, and inviting
all families to a public event. Individual interactions between parents and
teachers involve a particular child.
These include parent-teacher conferences or personal correspondence between
a teacher and a parent. While
institutional has potential to promote parental involvement, it does not foster
a strong parent-school relationship like individual communication.
Secondary
schools are larger organizations compared to primary schools and often see a
decline in parent volunteers. Eccles
and Harold (1993) suggest that the decline in parent volunteers is due to the
fact that “middle schools are more departmentalized – resulting in less
personal contact and parents’ feel alienated” (p. 7). In addition, Eccles et al. (1993) states,
“school personnel may inhibit parent involvement by their own beliefs and
attitudes about parent involvement” (p.7).
Secondary school teachers are often grouped by content and grade level. When schools adopt this type of schedule, a
student has seven or more different teachers.
This can make individual communication a huge task for teachers. Eccles
made this suggestion:
Keeping parents informed is a
second method to enhance family connections to the school in the middle
years. Communication should begin prior
to the child’s making the secondary school transition in order to preempt the
forces that lead to a decline in parents’ involvement at this point in the
children’s schooling. Furthermore, it is
essential that schools go beyond the more traditional approaches to
communication, such as conferences and open houses, to an approach that sets up
a personal relationship between particular teachers and each parent. For example, the school should assign an
advisor to each student/family; this advisor could then serve as the contact
person for both the student and his or her parents, and could make sure parents
are given ample information about the school in general and about their
adolescent in particular. This
relationship could also provide the entrée for parents into the school, and
thus establish an environment that feels both safe and encouraging for parent
involvement. (Eccles et al., 1993, pp. 8)
Homeroom teachers serve as advisors for
students and are the primary contact for parents. This system would imitate primary school
communication while fostering individual communication. Lunts (2003) suggest “new
technologies have the power to better the parent‐teacher relationship by
providing easy, efficient, and effective methods of transferring
information.” Schools must utilize
available technology in a methodical way to connect with parents.
Technology connects people like never before. Parents, teachers, and students engage
multiple avenues of communication daily.
Obrien (2011) confirmed the backpack folder is no longer the primary source
of information for parents. The top five preferred delivery method for school
news included E-mail, Online parent portal, e-newsletter, website, and voice
messaging system. Social media ranged
near the bottom of communication preferences.
Electronic communication enables parents and schools to communicate at
their convenience. Thompson (2008) explains,
“Parents and teachers indicated that emails worked most effectively to
communicate about grades because the messages involved simple, concrete
information” (pp. 208). Parents and
teachers discussed the behavior of students less. Thompson (2008) indicated “teachers were
extremely hesitant to use email to communicate about student behavior because
of the sensitive and sometimes complex nature of this communication” (pp. 209). Technology gives teachers and parents a new way
to communicate. However, it is not
always the most appropriate means of communication.
The effectiveness of communication is dependent on the
frequency and type. Obrien (2011) suggest most parents, 47%, want district
updates as often as decisions are made. 36% of parents want monthly updates, and
13% want quarterly. Less than 1% prefer less than quarterly communication.
Halsey (2005) reiterated.
Institutional contacts were
less likely to contribute to parent involvement than personal contacts between
teachers and parents. Schools need to
promote and support teachers’ efforts to contract parents in more personal
ways. Parents felt that detailed
information encouraged them to become involved because they felt more
comfortable about their role. Parents indicated
that they enjoyed a contact after an event because it made them feel
appreciated, and it encouraged them to volunteer in other capacities.
Schools are in a constant balancing act in their use of
technology and traditional forms of communication. Technology provides easy and efficient
communication. However, the most
effective communication is sometimes the traditional form. Parents are more receptive to individual forms
of communication than institutional.
Action
Research Design (Section Three)
Subjects
The aim of the research is to gain an understanding on how
to effectively communicate to the 2011-12 stakeholders at Belton Middle
School. Therefore, the subjects were
teachers and parents of students at Belton Middle School.
Procedures
Table 2 describes the actions taken to assess and address the
preferred method of communication.
Table 2
Procedure Timeline
Task Responsible Time
Resource Evaluation
|
Create survey
|
Zach Kline
|
9/6/11-9/12/11
|
Google Web Survey
|
Have an accessible survey
|
|
Request campus
demographics from 2010-11 and 2011-12
|
Campus PEIMS – Cheryl
Lafitte
|
9/26/11-9/30/11
|
None
|
Able to obtain data
|
|
Distribute Survey
|
Homeroom Teachers
|
9/12/11-10/1/11
|
Note on report card and
campus website
|
Strive for 200 returned
surveys
|
|
Analyze data to determine
preferred method of
communication |
Zach Kline
|
10/1/11-10/8/11
|
Google Web Survey
|
What is the primary method
of preferred communication?
|
|
Implement a communication
system and distribute
information to parents |
Zach Kline/ Joe Brown /
Journalism Class
|
10/8/11-6/1/12
|
To be determined by survey
|
Information is being
distributed as to be determined
(monthly/biweekly) |
|
Parent Panel Discussion
|
Joe Brown
|
8/23/12
|
Multiple Parents
representing all grade levels participate in questions
|
Provide additional insight
to better communication
|
|
Analyze data and
form conclusion
|
Zach Kline
|
10/1/12
|
None
|
Have a grounded conclusion
|
Data
Collection
Every parent and teacher at Belton Middle School had the
opportunity to respond the to communication survey. The survey was multiple choice and included
one open-ended question. The survey was
conducted at the end of the first reporting period, 6 weeks into the school
year. Paper copies of the survey was dispersed
with report cards and the survey was available online.
Findings
(Section Four)
Two hundred fourteen surveys were completed. 21 teachers and 193 parents responded from
Belton Middle School.
In order of parent perceived effective to least effective of
current communication practices at Belton Middle School:
- Phone Call
- Face-to-Face
- Letters/Handouts
- Teacher Website
- Campus Radio Station
In order of Teacher perceived effective to least effective
of current communication practices at Belton Middle School:
- Face-to-Face
- Phone Call
- Teacher Website
- Letters/Handouts
- Radio Station


Parent
Comments:
My child seems to have a hard time getting notes to me and notes
returned to school so I value email communication.
Communication through email is most effective. I appreciate the teachers who regularly email
me. Mass text messages would be very
good as well. Reminders about early out
and other campus events would be great through some soft of text alert system.
Problem with communication is it doesn't seem everyone one is on the
same page. I know the teacher websites where pushed but yet only 2 teachers out
of 6 have theirs current and up to date. Makes it difficult for us to confirm
homework and due dates. I did not realize that there was a radio station until
parent teacher conferences. There is also only 2 teachers that send emails (
one of which also keeps website up to date) So I just wish that one form of
communication is chosen and everyone sticks to it. I would love to know
assignments and due dates so we can make sure our student doesn't get behind.
Consistency across the board would be extremely beneficial. I know each teacher has a website and
calendar but I don't feel they are used efficiently. Some
websites have not changed since the first week of school. I realize that they do not have the time or
opportunity to do this often, so if there was any way it could be streamlined
for them it would benefit all involved.
Information nights for incoming 6th grade parents, especially first time Jr high parents would be a huge benefit with a follow up meeting 6, 12 and 18 weeks into the school year. A new school year is all day to day routine for staff and teachers it is overwhelming for parents and students in a new school with new schedules. Our children look to us for guidance and assistance and information meetings would give parents and guardians the tools they need to help them. Anything parents can do or help their student with makes them more confident during the day and able to focus on learning instead of worrying about minor day to day routines.
Information nights for incoming 6th grade parents, especially first time Jr high parents would be a huge benefit with a follow up meeting 6, 12 and 18 weeks into the school year. A new school year is all day to day routine for staff and teachers it is overwhelming for parents and students in a new school with new schedules. Our children look to us for guidance and assistance and information meetings would give parents and guardians the tools they need to help them. Anything parents can do or help their student with makes them more confident during the day and able to focus on learning instead of worrying about minor day to day routines.
Teacher Comments:
Communication between staff and parents is kind of like kids learning styles. Some parents, like me (my son is in elementary), prefer email or notes to communicate while others like face to face. Each set of parents is different. I would send a survey out at the beginning of the year to see how each parent would prefer to be communicated with! I cannot stand to talk on the phone so would really not like to be receiving phone calls from teachers.
One parent that I texted about her son's remarkable progress on her
birthday said that I totally made her day, but another parent was extremely
angered when I sent her a text (that I had thought was a caring message). Therefore, I no longer text parents.
We have to use all available means to communicate with parents and staff
Parent
Panel Discussion Highlights:
Many parents prefer emails over phone calls for
notifications.
If teachers see something out of the ordinary regarding
their child, send an email for parents to be aware.
Some teacher websites are helpful while others only have
contact information.
If there is a possibility that an email could be
misinterpreted, do not send an email, use the phone.
Parents want to be notified about missing assignments.
Conclusions
and Recommendations (Section Five)
Effective communication between the school and parents can
foster greater student achievement. Campuses engage in institutional and
individual communication. Parents prefer
weekly institutional communication.
However, greater parent participation is gained from individual
communication. Personalized
communication that provided details about an event and directly connects their
student to the event will encourage parents to participate. Most parents will not be recruited to
volunteer from a generic school-wide newsletter.
Parents and campuses engage in many opportunities to
communicate through technology. Most
parents preferred e-mail as their main form of communication. Social media was very low on the list of
preferential communication. However,
there is a place for traditional communication. Student issues that stem from
behavior or other multidimensional issues, it is best to communicate on the
phone or face-to-face.
Schools should develop a policy for communication
consistency. Every school serves a
different population. Therefore, their
preferences may be different than those of the Belton Community. Policy for teacher website should be clear
and teachers should be held accountable to the minimum expectations. For example, all assignments must be posted
on an assignment calendar. In addition,
schools may wish to appoint a primary contact for students. Homeroom clusters can stay together for
multiple years so that the homeroom teacher and parents can build a positive
relationship.
Schools wishing to conduct
action research gain further insights of their stakeholder communications
should not be bound to communication styles that are currently in place. It is important to find ways to make your
current means of communication effective. Stakeholders may indicate a desire
for new avenues of communication such as texting or email subscriptions to
newsletters.
References
(Final Section)
Eccles,
J., Harold, R. (1993) Parent-School Involvement during the Early
Adolescent Years. Teachers College Record
94(3) 568-587.
Halsey,
P. (2005) Parent Involvement in Junior High Schools: A Failure to
Communicate. American Secondary Education
34(1), 57-69.
Lunts, E. (2003). Parental
involvement in children’s education: Connecting family and school by using
telecommunication technologies. Meridian: A Middle School Computer
Technologies Journal, 6(1), 1‐8.
Obrien,
A. (2011) What Parens Want in School Communication. Edutopia.
Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/blog/parent-involvement-survey-anne-
Obrien.
Thompson, B 2008,
April Characteristics of parent-teacher email communication. Communication Education, 57(2), 201-223.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)